Radiographic Assessment of Tibiofibular Syndesmosis Injury with Different Durations and Types of Fixation.

INTRODUCTION: There is no consensus among orthopedic surgeons on the number of cortical layers (tricortical or quadricortical fixation) involved or the duration of syndesmotic fixation after a tibiofibular syndesmosis (TFSD)-injury treatment. The purpose of this study was to assess radiographic parameters following the treatment of TFSD injuries, with various time-windows of syndesmotic screw removal and numbers of cortical layers involved. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-five patients, aged from 25 to 75 years, were included in the study. The follow-up period ranged from 2 years to 4 years and 2 months. The patients were subdivided into groups based on the duration of the syndesmotic fixation (8-15 weeks-19 patients or 16-22 weeks-36 patients) and the number of cortices involved (tricortical-17 patients or quadricortical fixation-38 patients). RESULTS: The quadricortical fixation group showed a significant development of ankle joint arthritis and subtalar joint arthritis at the final follow-up. The mean medial clear space was 2.84 mm in the tricortical fixation group and 3.5 mm in the quadricortical fixation group (p = 0.005). Both groups, with different screw removal times showed significant development of posttraumatic arthritis. A comparison of the two groups (with different time-windows of the screw removal) revealed a significant difference only in terms of the postoperative tibiofibular (TF) overlap and the observed rates of talonavicular arthritis at the final follow-up. DISCUSSION: We found that the duration of the screw fixation had no effect on most of the evaluated radiographic parameters. Only the postoperative TF overlap was lower in the 8-15-week fixation group, and the proportion of patients with talonavicular joint arthritis at the final follow-up was higher in the 16-22-week fixation group. In addition, the number of cortices involved in the screw fixation had no effect on the radiographic outcomes in our patients, apart from the differences in one parameter-the medial clear space-at the final follow-up. CONCLUSION: We achieved similar radiographic results irrespective of the duration of the screw fixation and the number of cortices involved. All study subgroups showed the development of adjacent-joint arthritis following treatment. Considering the results of our study, the economic and medical aspects of treatment, and the possibility of a faster recovery, the most optimal solution seems to be the use of a tricortical fixation, with the screws being removed after 8-15 weeks.

Kinematic Parameters Following Pilon Fracture Treatment with the Ilizarov Method.

Background: The purpose of our study was to analyze kinematic parameters following pilon fracture treatment with the Ilizarov method. Methods: Our study assessed kinematic parameters of gait in 23 patients with pilon fractures treated with the Ilizarov method. Patients had completed their treatment 24−48 months prior to measurements. The range-of-motion values in the non-operated limb (NOL) and operated limb (OL) were compared. Kinematic parameters were measured using the Noraxon MyoMOTION System. Results: We observed no significant differences in hip flexion, hip abduction, or knee flection between the OLs and NOLs in patients after treatment with the Ilizarov method. We observed significant differences in the ranges of ankle dorsiflexion, inversion, and abduction (p < 0.001; p < 0.001; p < 0.003, respectively) between the OLs and the NOLs. Conclusion: Following pilon fracture treatment with the Ilizarov method, we observed no differences in terms of knee or hip joint mobility between the OL and the NOL, whereas the range of motion in the ankle joint of the OL was significantly limited. The treatment of pilon fractures with the Ilizarov method does not ensure the complete normalization of ankle joint kinematic parameters. Therefore, intense personalized rehabilitation of the ankle joint is recommended.

The Effect of the Covid-19 Pandemic on the Epidemiology of Ankle Joint Injuries in Adults and Children.

BACKGROUND: Ankle joint injuries are an important orthopedic issue due to their high incidence and the variety of treatment methods available. This study assessed the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the epidemiology and treatment of ankle joint injuries. There is lack of papers which address this problem. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study compared epidemiological data on ankle joint injuries in adults and children collected during the period of the COVID-19 pandemic (2020) and a corresponding prepandemic period (2019). Epidemiological data, demographic data, treatment methods, hospital stay duration, and injury-to-surgery time were analyzed. RESULTS: The total number of patients hospitalized for ankle fractures in the evaluated pandemic period was lower by 34% than that in the corresponding prepandemic period in 2019. The pediatric patient subpopulation showed a 70% decline during the analyzed period of COVID-19 pandemic. The number of hospitalized females declined by 12%, and the number of hospitalized males dropped by 53%. CONCLUSIONS: 1. Our study showed the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the epidemiology and treatment of ankle joint injuries. 2. The COVID-19 pandemic effected a decrease in the number of patients with ankle joint injuries, particularly pediatric and male patients with these injuries. 3. National lockdown measures had a considerable effect on lowering the numbers of pediatric patients with ankle joint injuries treated conservatively. 4. Importantly, the tendency can be noted among orthopedic surgeons and emergency room doctors to more readily qualify orthopedic patients for a trial of conservative treatment. This only prolongs the duration of treatment and time to the ultimate therapeutic surgery.

Assessment of the lower limb biomechanics in patients after tibiofibular syndesmosis injury treatment.

PURPOSE: There is no consensus as to the number of bone cortices engaged in tibiofibular syndesmosis treatment. The purpose of our study was to assess the weight distribution on the lower limbs after tricortical or quadricortical syndesmosis fixation and different timing of screw removal. METHODS: A total of 55 patients who underwent treatment for acute tibiofibular syndesmosis injury were analyzed in this study. The Zebris pedobarographic platform was used to measure the distribution of body weight on the lower limbs. The study population was stratified by the time to syndesmotic screw removal (8-15 weeks versus 16-22 weeks) and the number of bone cortices involved in fixation (three [tricortical fixation] versus four [quadricortical fixation]). RESULTS: The weight distribution on the operated and healthy limbs in patients with tricortical syndesmosis fixation was asymmetrical, with the mean load on the operated and healthy limbs of 48.38% and 51.62%, respectively. The patients who underwent quadricortical syndesmosis fixation exhibited a symmetrical distribution of weight on the operated and healthy limb. There was a symmetrical distribution of the load of body weight on the operated and healthy limbs both in the group with different times to syndesmotic screw removal. CONCLUSION: Tricortical syndesmosis fixation is associated with an asymmetrical weight distribution on the operated and healthy limbs. In treating tibiofibular syndesmosis injuries, based on our pedobarographic research, quadricortical syndesmosis fixation and leaving the syndesmotic screw in place for up to 15 weeks, seems more beneficial to the patient.